Sponsored by:
Texas Association of Environmental Professionals (TAEP)
TAEP is the premier organization for environmental
professionals in the State of Texas. The goals of TAEP include
the advancement of the environmental profession and the
establishment of a forum to discuss important environmental
issues. TAEP members receive a 10% discount. Please call
713.522.6300 for the code.
Published: 2024
Authors: Jeff D. Gamlin, Hassan Javed, Charles J. Newell, Emily Stockwell, Renee Caird, Joseph Scalia, Divina Navarro, John Awad
Abstract
This article addresses the urgent need for cost‐effective and sustainable methods to mitigate per‐ and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contamination in surface water and stormwater. Although the majority of PFAS research and development to date has focused on groundwater and soil treatment technologies, in some cases there may be a greater risk posed by the high mobility and potential for direct contact with PFAS in surface water and stormwater. Based on the evolving regulatory landscape and the
elevated PFAS concentrations observed in available stormwater data near some fire training facilities, additional attention to this topic is needed to support the development of effective and practical treatment technologies for PFAS in surface water and stormwater. We propose addressing the need to bridge the current technology gap between (1) expensive mechanical and/or construction‐intensive technologies and (2) the development of cost‐effective and sustainable surface water and stormwater
PFAS treatment options. We envision a future where nature‐based approaches could be employed for stand‐alone PFAS treatment. Alternatively, nature‐based approaches could be used for initial PFAS mass removal as a pretreatment step within a treatment train followed by engineered adsorbents or other technologies, if needed to achieve low concentration cleanup thresholds. We provide an example of a potential nature‐based treatment train that would rely on the natural propensity of PFAS to accumulate in surface water foams using foam‐enhancing weirs and flumes (FWFs), combined with the demonstrated treatment potential of constructed floating wetlands (CFWs). Additional research into the validation, optimization, and site‐specific design factors of nature‐based treatment trains, such as the FWF+CFW approach, warrants future research and development.